Number one blog for finding anything that has to do with the law. Read up on the law and know your rights. Labor Laws, Wage Laws, Contract Laws, and anything else that has to deal with justice and rights.
Thursday, January 2, 2014
House Prices Rise Again, but the Pace Could Slow
Friday, December 13, 2013
Sunday, December 8, 2013
Common Sense: Record Prices Mask a Tepid Art Market
Sunday, December 1, 2013
Consumer Prices Rise in Japan, Suggesting Stronger Growth
Tuesday, September 10, 2013
Prices Are Rising for New Homes, and the Land They Are Built On
Saturday, August 31, 2013
Major Surge Is Unlikely for Prices of U.S. Gas
Saturday, August 10, 2013
Stocks & Bonds: Surge in Commodities Prices Helps End Slump on Wall St.
Thursday, July 18, 2013
Bits Blog: Two Tales of Plummeting Prices
Timothy A. Clary/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images, Mark Blinch/Reuters Microsoft’s Surface tablet, left, cost $500 when it was released in October, but it is now $350 on Microsoft’s Web site. The BlackBerry Z10, right, was $200 with a contract when it was released; now it’s free with an AT&T contract.When a new digital device gets a big price cut, it’s usually good news for consumers, but it’s usually a sign of poor sales, too — even if the maker of the device doesn’t want to admit that publicly.
Take the BlackBerry Z10 smartphone, which, after disappointing sales, dropped significantly in price just a few months after release.
When it was released in the United States in March, the Z10 cost $200 with a contract. Now the Z10 is free at Best Buy with an AT&T contract, or for $50 with Verizon. In Canada, where the Z10 was released in February and where sales were stronger, the smartphone is $100 to $150.
Or take Microsoft’s Surface tablet. It cost $500 when it was released in October, but it is now $350 on Microsoft’s Web site. Analysts estimate that demand for the tablet was weak during the holiday quarter.
It has become a tradition for company representatives to shrug off a major price cut and say that these types of sales always happen. That was Nokia’s explanation when it halved the Lumia 900’s price soon after release, and AT&T’s explanation for the price cut of the HTC First, the Facebook phone. Neither of those devices were selling well.
Meanwhile, the price of the iPhone 5, one of the best-selling smartphones in the world, hasn’t changed since its release in September.
Adam Emery, a BlackBerry spokesman, said that trimming the price of a smartphone was part of normal procedure:
Like any other smartphone maker, we, along with our partners, make adjustments as we roll out new elements of the product portfolio. And with the recent arrival of our flagship BlackBerry Q10 smartphone, now is the right time to adjust the price for the BlackBerry Z10 all touch device. As we have said, we will be introducing several BlackBerry 10 devices before the end of our fiscal year. It’s part of life cycle management to tier the pricing for current devices to make room for the next ones. This is just one element of our marketing strategy that will ensure we remain aggressive in a very competitive market landscape.
Microsoft’s response is a bit different. The software maker, which is a new player in the mobile hardware market, says it has been happy with past promotions it has done for the Surface, like one in the United States in which customers received a free keyboard cover when they bought the tablet. So it says it is sharply cutting the price to get the tablet into even more people’s hands:
We’ve been seeing great success with pricing and cover promotions over the past several months on Surface RT in the U.S. and other markets. People who buy Surface love Surface, and we’re excited about all those additional people out sharing their excitement for Surface with other people.
Sales for mobile devices do happen. But Jan Dawson, a telecom analyst at Ovum, says that if a device is still new, a big discount is typically a sign that its sales didn’t start off strong and the company is trying to clear out inventory.
“In the case of the Z10 it seems to have happened pretty quickly,” he said of BlackBerry’s phone, “which probably means one of two things: It’s selling poorly, or they want to clear inventory before bringing out something more appealing later this year.”
This post has been revised to reflect the following correction:
Correction: July 17, 2013
An earlier version of this post referred incorrectly to the country in which customers received a free keyboard cover when they bought a Surface tablet. It was in the United States, not Japan.
Sunday, July 14, 2013
Nudged by Gas Prices, Wholesale Inflation Rises
Saturday, July 13, 2013
Sudden Spike in Gas Prices, but Increases May Be Short-Lived
This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:
Correction: July 12, 2013
An earlier version of this article misspelled the surname of a senior executive at Statoil. He is Stale Tungesvik, not Tugesvik. It also misspelled the name of a Canadian oil company. It is Cenovus Energy, not Cenovis Energy.
Friday, July 5, 2013
2 Infant Formula Makers to Cut Prices After China Starts an Investigation
Tuesday, June 25, 2013
DealBook: Suntory Beverage Unit Prices Tokyo I.P.O. at $4 Billion
Sunday, June 16, 2013
Food and Gas Drove Wholesale Prices Up in May
Wednesday, May 29, 2013
March Home Prices See Best Annual Rise in Seven Years
Thursday, May 2, 2013
Home Prices Rise, Seen Helping Economic Recovery
Single-Family Home Prices Increased 9.3% in February
The biggest gains in home prices were in some of the cities that were hardest hit by the crisis, including Phoenix, Atlanta and Las Vegas. Above, homes under construction in Atlanta in March. The S&P/Case Shiller index of 20 metropolitan areas released on Tuesday showed single-family home prices rose 9.3 percent in February from a year earlier. The data reinforces the view that rising home prices could make Americans feel better about spending this year, helping counter a blow to economic growth from tax increases and government spending cuts. “This will be a powerful positive fundamental, not only for housing, but presumably helpful for consumer spending as well,” said Stephen Stanley an economist at Pierpont Securities in Stamford, Conn. Another report showed consumer confidence rebounded in April as Americans felt better about the outlook for the economy and their income prospects. The Conference Board, a private industry group, said its index of consumer attitudes rose to 68.1 from a revised 61.9 the previous month. Economists polled by Reuters had expected a reading of 60.8. Still, there appears to be a growing risk that weakness in the labor market and broader economy could dial down the housing recovery’s strength. Hiring slowed drastically in March and economic growth was lackluster in the first quarter, raising fear that the economy could struggle to cope with Washington’s austerity drive. Business activity in the Midwest unexpectedly contracted in April to its lowest level since September 2009 as a gauge of employment declined, another report showed. The Institute for Supply Management-Chicago business barometer fell to 49, below the 50 mark that denotes contraction and falling short of economists’ expectations for 52.5.
Thursday, January 10, 2013
Target to Match Some Rivals' Online Prices Year-Round
Saturday, December 15, 2012
Consumer Prices Fall 0.3% on Lower Gas Costs
Friday, November 23, 2012
Oil Prices Stay Steady Despite Mideast Conflict
Wednesday, October 17, 2012
Economix Blog: Housing Prices and Income Inequality
Why is the gap between rich and poor in America yawning ever wider?
The issue is urgent. As my colleague Annie Lowrey writes, there is growing evidence that income inequality impedes economic growth.
And one interesting explanation boils down to the high price of housing.
A recent paper by researchers at Harvard University argues that the prohibitive cost of living in the areas with the greatest economic opportunities has forced low-wage workers to migrate instead to areas with inferior opportunities.
“The best places for low- and high-skilled workers used to be the same places: California, Maryland, New York,” said Peter Ganong, a doctoral student in economics, who wrote the paper with Daniel Shoag, a professor of public policy. “Now low-skilled workers can no longer afford to move to the high-wage places.”
In this account, people aren’t moving to the Sun Belt because they want to live there. They are moving because they can’t afford to live in Boston. And the result isn’t just second-best for them; it also slows the pace of economic growth.
Basically, the economy works best when people can move where their skills are most valued. But for low-skill workers, the high price of housing means the cost of living in those places often exceeds the benefits of working there.
The trends are beautifully illustrated by three time-lapse graphics.
The first shows that average incomes by state converged between 1880 and 1980 as low-skilled workers moved to wealthier states. The second shows the pattern of migration, which has changed significantly over the last 30 years.
The third shows the increase in land-use regulations in rich states.
And here’s the crucial point: It doesn’t have to be this way. High housing prices are the result of public policies that discourage new development. Those policies are generally embraced by the residents of wealthy areas, who benefit, at least in the short term, from restrictions on the supply of new housing. But this paper is one more reason to worry about the long-term economic consequences.