Number one blog for finding anything that has to do with the law. Read up on the law and know your rights. Labor Laws, Wage Laws, Contract Laws, and anything else that has to deal with justice and rights.
Wednesday, February 19, 2014
Thursday, January 2, 2014
Saturday, December 7, 2013
Flaws in Enrollment Records for Insurance Exchange
Wednesday, June 12, 2013
DealBook: S.E.C. Fines Options Exchange for Lax Oversight
Scott Olson/Getty ImagesThe Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index options pit at the Chicago Board Options Exchange.The Securities and Exchange Commission fined the Chicago Board Options Exchange and an affiliate $6 million on Tuesday for what it called breakdowns in regulatory oversight, including a failure to enforce rules to prevent abusive short-selling.
The agency said the financial penalty against the exchange and its affiliate, C2 Options Exchange, was the first action related to an exchange’s responsibility to self-police its market.
The case stemmed in part from oversight of OptionsXpress, a firm now owned by Charles Schwab, which was accused by the S.E.C. of engaging in an abusive naked short-selling scheme, or selling shares before borrowing them first. An S.E.C. judge on Friday ordered OptionsXpress, its former chief financial officer and a customer to pay $4.8 million in fines and to return $4.2 million.
In a statement, the S.E.C. said: “Self-regulatory organizations must enforce the federal securities laws as well as their own rules to regulate trading on their exchanges by their member firms. In doing so, they must sufficiently manage an inherent conflict that exists between self-regulatory obligations and the business interests of an S.R.O. and its members. An S.E.C. investigation found that C.B.O.E. failed to adequately police and control this conflict for a member firm that later became the subject of an S.E.C. enforcement action. C.B.O.E. put the interests of the firm ahead of its regulatory obligations by failing to properly investigate the firm’s compliance” with the regulation against abusive short-selling and then interfered with the S.E.C. investigation into the firm.
The S.E.C. added that the exchange had an ineffective surveillance program that failed to detect wrongdoing despite numerous red flags that its members were engaged in abusive short-selling and also did not live up to its regulatory and compliance responsibilities in several other areas over four years.
“This settlement marks a significant step in putting the S.E.C. matter behind us, but our commitment to maintaining the very highest standards in regulation and compliance will be carried forward throughout our organization,” the exchange said in a statement.
“In addition to working proactively with the S.E.C. throughout its investigation, we voluntarily launched our own exhaustive, internal assessment of regulatory and compliance practices across our entire organization, assisted by third-party consultants and independent outside counsel. All actions either required or recommended by the S.E.C., as well as those resulting from our rigorous self-review, have been or are now being implemented,” it said.
Monday, June 10, 2013
New Exchange Hopes to Be Nasdaq for IP
Wednesday, June 5, 2013
Sharp Exchange Between Lawyers Marks Day Seven of Priest Abuse Trial Deliberations
Sunday, May 12, 2013
Bill Would Deny Iran Access to Foreign Exchange Reserves
Thursday, December 27, 2012
DealBook: London Stock Exchange Revises Offer for Clearinghouse
LONDON — The London Stock Exchange Group said on Monday that it had revised the terms of its takeover proposal for LCH.Clearnet, citing the changing regulatory environment.
The London Stock Exchange provisionally agreed to pay 15 euros, or $20, a share for 60 percent of LCH.Clearnet, independent clearinghouse for financial transactions. In March, the London bourse offered 19 euros a share, plus 1 euro per share as a special dividend to be paid in five years.
The companies said the changes followed discussions over coming regulation that could force the LCH to raise more capital and crimp profits. European regulators have been proposing stricter rules for clearinghouses to safeguard their operations, forcing them to increase their reserves.
Like rivals, the London Stock Exchange has looked to deals in the face of increasing competition and weakness in its core equity business. With LCH, the London exchange may benefit from regulatory changes, capturing the increasing volume of over-the-counter derivatives that will move to clearinghouses. The stock exchange currently outsources clearing activities to LCH.
Such businesses have been especially attractive in the current conditions. Last week, the IntercontinentalExchange agreed to pay $8.2 billion for NYSE Euronext to create a trans-Atlantic trading giant with a major focus on derivatives.
Under the revised plan, the London Stock Exchange would pay 14 euros per LCH.Clearnet share on completion of the transaction and 1 euro per share in 2017, which would replace the special dividend, the two companies said. Both payments would be in cash. The firms also agreed on extending their takeover negotiations until Jan. 31 to finalize the details of the offer.