Showing posts with label Enhance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Enhance. Show all posts

Saturday, December 22, 2012

10 Tips to Enhance Your Chance of Getting a Good Performance Review

Debra Bruce, president of Lawyer-Coach in Houston Debra Bruce, president of Lawyer-Coach in Houston
Image: Sylvester Garza

This is the time of year when many lawyers have a meeting with a supervisor or a compensation committee to discuss their performance over the past year. Many big firms, corporations and government agencies have instituted procedures that give the attorney an opportunity to submit a self-evaluation in advance of their performance review. Many small law firms are more informal, or even haphazard, about the process, however.

If there is an established procedure, follow the guidelines or instructions. When an organization doesn't have a formal review procedure, I recommend that my clients prepare a concise memo, email or other written communication summarizing their accomplishments of the past year. Most associates just wait anxiously, but passively, for the news. They may think the partners are aware of what they have been doing all year, or perhaps they think it is safer to stay under the radar. Maybe they just don't know what else to do.

I believe it is necessary to be proactive about your career. You can stop by the office of the appropriate person with your memo and say something like, "I know that you have a lot on your plate at the end of the year. I thought I might save you a little time and make things easier on you if I prepared a summary of what I've been doing over the past year. If there are other ways I can be of assistance, please let me know."

Here are a few tips on putting together your year-end self-evaluation:

1. Don't just rely on your memory. By October or November, it will be difficult to remember what happened in March and April. I urge my clients to keep a "success journal" throughout the year. Keep track of the significant projects you worked on, developmental milestones you achieved and compliments or expressions of appreciation from clients, partners, co-workers, bosses, etc. If possible, record exact quotes and the date, and save copies of complimentary emails and letters. Put complimentary quotes in your memo and consider attaching copies of glowing emails.

2. Review your administrative records to refresh your memory. Look back over your calendar, time entries, client lists, expense reports or any other records that will remind you of what you have done since your last review. If you received a formal report or took notes at your last review, be sure to look at those also.

3. Start with your strengths and your most significant accomplishments. Remember the journalist's adage, "Don't bury the lead." Your reader may get interrupted, distracted or bored after the first few paragraphs. Emphasize work with your largest clients or highest-ranking leaders. Highlight strong revenue generation, or the most significant milestone achievement you made for a lawyer at your experience level. Show how you took on responsibility for keeping a complex project on track or for shepherding younger lawyers. Make the first impression a good one.

4. Avoid the passive tense as much as possible. As lawyers, we generally draft documents in the passive tense, but that underwhelms a reader. Active verbs convey conviction, energy and strength. Your boss wants to know that you have what it takes to get the job done. A memo infused with action naturally instills more confidence in the reader.

5. Don't make assumptions about what your reader understands. People who don't work with you may participate in the decision process. Give specifics and spell out how you have contributed value to the organization or have enhanced your ability to perform more sophisticated work. Provide the names and titles of clients you have courted and what kind of business that may bring the firm. Explain how your skillful deposition of a witness shrank the settlement demand, saving the client $300,000. Describe how your consistent efforts at maintaining law school acquaintances are paying off now that a classmate has accepted an important in-house counsel position. Draw attention to the large dollar amounts or high-profile personalities involved in your cases or transactions.

6. Demonstrate your ability to be a team player without selling yourself short. Give credit to others who played a significant role in your accomplishments, but don't weaken your perceived level of contribution by overusing "we" instead of "I." Share information on leads and referrals you have provided to other members of your organization. Explain how you have taken on leadership or mentoring roles.

7. Think about the goals and objectives of your department or organization. Describe your accomplishments in terms that demonstrate how they support those objectives. You might feel honored to be elected to the local board of the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. If your organization's leaders don't share your passion for that cause, however, you will need to point out how your service on the board will create goodwill or positive publicity for the firm, will help you build relationships with other civic leaders who can be good referral sources, or provide other such benefits. Explain how any significant nonbillable work you have done inures to the benefit of the firm.

8. Show how you focus on continual development. Reflect in your report how you have addressed any criticisms you received at your last review or during the year. State some goals and objectives you intend to work toward in the coming year. Give a progress report on goals you identified in your last review. Describe your efforts to gain additional expertise or take on more significant responsibilities.

9. Explain significant deficits in your numbers. Everyone may be well aware that you had a baby this year, but they may forget to consider your maternity leave when reviewing your billable hours. If your collections are down because your most significant client got wiped out by a devastating hurricane, point that out, along with any expectations of eventual payment. If the industry you serve is in an economic slump, consider providing statistics on the industry's status and any reliable predictions about recovery. You may think everyone knows your situation, but we can all get pretty myopic. If your situation is not poised for a turnaround, explain how you are retooling your skills, seeking to serve a different industry or positioning yourself to help busier departments. Don't bring up the demands on your time outside of work, except in extraordinary circumstances. Be careful not to whine, complain or sound like a victim. That will undermine your credibility and the confidence they have in you.

10. Ask someone you trust to review your self-evaluation. Get a colleague with more experience or greater political savvy to give you feedback on your memo before you submit it. The tone you intended to set may not come through in your writing. You might have highlighted things that don't really matter to the powers that be.

Your career success warrants this extra effort, and the opportunity only comes up once or twice per year. Make the best of it.

Debra L. Bruce is president of Lawyer-Coach LLC, a law practice management training and coaching firm. She practiced law for 18 years and has been a professionally trained executive coach for more than 11 years. She is a frequent speaker and writer on law practice management topics, and has served as the vice chair of the law practice management committee of the State Bar of Texas. She welcomes questions and comments at 713-682-4353 or debra@lawyer-coach.com.

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

How to Use Document Review Work to Enhance a Resume

Tommy Flynn, Getty Images

When attorneys think back to law school orientation or the pitch the school used to convince them to attend, they probably remember a spiel about all of the wonderful things a person can do with a law degree. As safe a bet as that might be, the safer bet would be that no one ever mentioned document review as a possible career path.

Most readers would probably agree that, in the legal community, there's a certain stigma to doing doc review professionally. So when Texas Lawyer asked whether I'd be willing to write about my doc review experience, I was a little apprehensive.

Did I want the world to know that I couldn't find a "real" job, with "real" clients and a "real" paycheck? Frankly, as a recent law school grad, I had debated whether my doc review job would even go on my resume, and now I was being asked to advertise it to every potential employer in Texas.

As it turned out, my perception of reality wasn't quite aligned with reality itself. I did include doc review on my resume, but it certainly didn't make me unhirable. Quite the opposite -- it actually helped me build my resume, which in turn helped me get a job at a great firm. Just as importantly, it taught me a set of skills that I could take forward into my career.

So, how was I able to build my resume by doing doc review? It started with the realization that the job listing needed a better description than just "reviewed documents." I needed more responsibility, which, as it turned out, wasn't extremely difficult to get. Doc review is not unlike most other jobs -- advancement requires attrition and merit.

Attrition is out of a doc reviewer's control. People quit or are let go; the project ends or its scope changes. Whatever the reasons, the number of people on the project dwindles over time. Those folks may be replaced eventually, but they may not. In any case, if there is ever more complex work to be done, the general rule seems to be that it goes to those with seniority.

What a doc review attorney can control is his or her merit. Before employers and supervisors decide to advance a candidate within the organization, they evaluate the candidate's merit. The definition of merit varies depending on the position; it may mean being a fast document reviewer, a good researcher and writer, or a natural leader. But whatever the position, there are three things an attorney must understand to succeed: the case, the documents and the review medium.

• Understand the case. The majority of doc review projects arise out of litigation. That is, one side or the other produces the documents during discovery. If either side needs to hire professional doc reviewers, chances are that the litigation is large, complex or both. By large, I mean that the scope of discovery can cover hundreds of thousands or even millions of pages.

To move through these documents thoroughly and efficiently, a doc reviewer needs a deep understanding of the case. The reviewer most likely will have access to the pleadings, which provide a good overview of the factual allegations, claims and defenses. The reviewer's primary goal is to find documents that factually support the elements of these claims and defenses. If, for example, one party alleges theft of trade secrets, a document produced by the other party discussing those secrets is legally significant.

The ambitious doc reviewer should study thoroughly whatever materials supervisors provide, so he can familiarize himself with the case. If the project allows workers to take materials home, he should do so. If that's not possible, the reviewer at least should read up on areas of law central to the case. This is especially true for those reviewers who are fresh out of law school, like I was. Reading up on the relevant areas of law helped me scale the learning curve faster than everyone else.

Sunday, September 23, 2012

How to Use Document Review Work to Enhance a Resume

Tommy Flynn, Getty Images

When attorneys think back to law school orientation or the pitch the school used to convince them to attend, they probably remember a spiel about all of the wonderful things a person can do with a law degree. As safe a bet as that might be, the safer bet would be that no one ever mentioned document review as a possible career path.

Most readers would probably agree that, in the legal community, there's a certain stigma to doing doc review professionally. So when Texas Lawyer asked whether I'd be willing to write about my doc review experience, I was a little apprehensive.

Did I want the world to know that I couldn't find a "real" job, with "real" clients and a "real" paycheck? Frankly, as a recent law school grad, I had debated whether my doc review job would even go on my resume, and now I was being asked to advertise it to every potential employer in Texas.

As it turned out, my perception of reality wasn't quite aligned with reality itself. I did include doc review on my resume, but it certainly didn't make me unhirable. Quite the opposite -- it actually helped me build my resume, which in turn helped me get a job at a great firm. Just as importantly, it taught me a set of skills that I could take forward into my career.

So, how was I able to build my resume by doing doc review? It started with the realization that the job listing needed a better description than just "reviewed documents." I needed more responsibility, which, as it turned out, wasn't extremely difficult to get. Doc review is not unlike most other jobs -- advancement requires attrition and merit.

Attrition is out of a doc reviewer's control. People quit or are let go; the project ends or its scope changes. Whatever the reasons, the number of people on the project dwindles over time. Those folks may be replaced eventually, but they may not. In any case, if there is ever more complex work to be done, the general rule seems to be that it goes to those with seniority.

What a doc review attorney can control is his or her merit. Before employers and supervisors decide to advance a candidate within the organization, they evaluate the candidate's merit. The definition of merit varies depending on the position; it may mean being a fast document reviewer, a good researcher and writer, or a natural leader. But whatever the position, there are three things an attorney must understand to succeed: the case, the documents and the review medium.

• Understand the case. The majority of doc review projects arise out of litigation. That is, one side or the other produces the documents during discovery. If either side needs to hire professional doc reviewers, chances are that the litigation is large, complex or both. By large, I mean that the scope of discovery can cover hundreds of thousands or even millions of pages.

To move through these documents thoroughly and efficiently, a doc reviewer needs a deep understanding of the case. The reviewer most likely will have access to the pleadings, which provide a good overview of the factual allegations, claims and defenses. The reviewer's primary goal is to find documents that factually support the elements of these claims and defenses. If, for example, one party alleges theft of trade secrets, a document produced by the other party discussing those secrets is legally significant.

The ambitious doc reviewer should study thoroughly whatever materials supervisors provide, so he can familiarize himself with the case. If the project allows workers to take materials home, he should do so. If that's not possible, the reviewer at least should read up on areas of law central to the case. This is especially true for those reviewers who are fresh out of law school, like I was. Reading up on the relevant areas of law helped me scale the learning curve faster than everyone else.